comparisons
Floriva vs Glow: On-Device Privacy vs Cloud Fertility Tracking
Floriva vs Glow compared on privacy, data storage, and features. Glow is cloud-based, settled with the California AG in 2020 for $250K over a data vulnerability, and had a separate API bug in 2024 that exposed data of about 25 million users. Floriva stores everything on your device.
Glow is built for people actively trying to conceive. It has partner sharing, community forums, and detailed fertility metrics. It is also a cloud based app that stores your health data on company servers. Those servers have had two documented security incidents: a 2016 vulnerability found by Consumer Reports that led to a $250,000 California AG settlement in 2020, and a separate 2024 API bug that exposed data of about 25 million users. Floriva is built for people who want their cycle data to stay on their device. No servers, no accounts, no data to subpoena. Less fertility specific depth, more privacy by design. The Core Difference Glow is a cloud app. Your cycle data, fertility markers, symptoms, and partner shared information live on Glow's servers. You need an account. The company has access to your data. Floriva is an on device app. Your data lives on your phone. No account. No server copy. The company cannot access your data because the company does not have it. This is not a policy difference. It is an architecture difference. Glow could change its privacy policy tomorrow and your data would still be on their servers. Floriva could not access your data even if it wanted to.