comparisons

Published by Floriva · Updated 2026-05-01 · How Floriva checks its guides

Symptom Logging Apps Compared: Floriva vs Clue vs Flo vs Bearable (2026)

Which period tracker logs the most symptoms? We compare symptom tracking depth, customization, pain scales, and privacy across Floriva, Clue, Flo, and Bearable.

Bearable tracks the widest range of health symptoms but stores everything in the cloud. Clue offers structured symptom categories with good customization. Flo has broad symptom options but pairs them with an ad-supported, cloud-stored architecture. Floriva provides customizable symptom logging with all data stored locally on your device.

What symptom logging actually requires

Symptom tracking in a period app is not a checkbox exercise. Useful symptom data needs three things: the right categories for what you experience, intensity levels that tell a mild headache from a migraine, and tools that connect symptoms to cycle phases over time.

Most period trackers treat symptoms as secondary to cycle dates. You get a list of common symptoms, tap the ones you have, and the app moves on. For basic tracking, this works. For anyone managing endometriosis, PMDD, PCOS, or chronic pain, it falls short.

Here is how four apps handle symptom logging, and what the differences mean for your tracking.

Floriva: custom and local

Floriva supports daily symptom notes and pattern review. Check current onboarding for exact symptom fields, scales, categories, imports, and exports.

The key difference is architectural. Core symptom data stays local-first. Correlations between symptoms and cycle phases are computed locally. Optional encrypted sync may send unreadable ciphertext. That matters when those logs describe chronic pain, mental health patterns, or medication effects.

For users who track symptoms to prepare for medical appointments, Floriva can help organize notes for visit prep. Check current onboarding for exact export options before promising a specific file or format.

Clue: structured but limited

Clue organizes symptoms into well-defined categories: pain, mood, energy, skin, digestion, and more. The interface is clean. The categories are backed by menstrual health research. Clue's science-first approach means the symptom categories reflect actual clinical relevance.

The limitation is granularity. Clue uses binary tracking for most symptoms: you either experienced something or you did not. There is no intensity scale for most categories. If you need to tell mild cramping from severe pain, Clue's data model does not capture that difference.

Clue also uses pre-defined symptom lists. Custom categories are limited. If your experience does not fit Clue's taxonomy, you cannot track it within the app.

All data is stored on Clue's servers in Berlin. Clue has a clean enforcement record and strong GDPR compliance, but the data is still server-stored and account-linked.

Flo: broad but compromised

Flo offers a wide range of built-in symptom options covering pain, mood, physical symptoms, sexual health, and lifestyle factors. AI-powered insights look for patterns in your symptom data.

The breadth is real. Flo tracks more symptom categories out of the box than Clue. The AI analysis benefits from Flo's large user base, which provides a bigger dataset for pattern recognition.

The problems are documented. Flo's free tier is ad-supported, embedding advertising SDKs alongside your symptom data. The FTC took enforcement action in 2021 for sharing health data with Facebook and Google. Flo settled a $59.5M class action in 2025. Your symptom data sits on servers with this track record.

Like Clue, Flo uses mostly binary symptom logging without intensity scales.

Bearable: deep but not period-focused

Bearable is the most granular symptom tracker in this comparison. It lets you track symptoms, medications, diet, sleep, weather, and custom factors with intensity scales and time stamps. Correlation analysis shows how different factors relate to each other.

Bearable was designed for chronic condition management, not period tracking. It can be used for cycle tracking, but it lacks period-specific features like ovulation prediction, fertility windows, and cycle phase identification that dedicated period apps provide.

If you manage a chronic condition alongside your cycle, Bearable captures data that no period-specific app matches. All of that data goes to Bearable's servers, and the app requires an account.

The comparison matrix

For simple period tracking with basic symptom logging, all four apps work. The differences emerge when you need more.

Custom symptoms: Bearable supports custom symptoms. Check current Floriva onboarding for exact fields and customization options. Clue and Flo lock you into pre-defined lists.

Pain intensity: Floriva and Bearable offer scales. Clue and Flo use binary logging.

Privacy: Floriva keeps core records local-first. The other three require accounts and server storage.

Chronic condition support: Bearable leads. Floriva offers custom tracking. Clue and Flo are limited to their built-in categories.

Period-specific intelligence: Clue and Flo have the longest track records for cycle prediction. Floriva provides cycle-phase correlation locally. Bearable lacks dedicated period features.

Which one fits

If you track symptoms casually alongside your period, Clue's clean interface and science backing work well. The tradeoff is server storage.

If symptom tracking is central to managing a chronic condition, Bearable's depth is unmatched. Your detailed health data lives on their servers.

If you want granular symptom tracking with cycle correlation and data that never leaves your device, Floriva is the only option in this comparison that offers both customization and local storage.

If symptom data is medical-grade sensitive for you, the storage question is not secondary. It is the question.